USPTO serial 76617256
SWAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 27, 2007
- Examiner
- GOLD, BARBARA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with SWAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $797*
Plus Government fees of $1,950
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MASPETH, NY, US
Jackson Heights, NY, US
EDISON, NJ, US
Jackson Heights, NY, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES E. SHLESINGER
JAMES E. SHLESINGER FRESH IP PLC11710 PLAZA AMERICA DR., SUITE 2000RESTON, VA 20190United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | PROCESSED BEANS; PROCESSED NUTS; EDIBLE OILS; BUTTER; SNACK FOODS, NAMELY, SOY-BASED SNACK FOODS AND CHICK-PEA BASED SNACK FOODS; PICKLES; FROZEN FRUIT AND VEGETABLES; FRUIT PULP; FRUIT PUREE; FROZEN AND PREPARED MEALS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF [MEAT, FISH, POULTRY, OR] VEGETABLES | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | CEREAL-BASED SNACK FOODS, RICE BASED SNACK FOODS; PROCESSED GRAINS; PROCESSED WHEAT; DESSERTS, NAMELY, BAKERY DESSERTS AND DAIRY-BASED DESSERTS, NAMELY, CHILLED OR WARM CAKE OR DUMPLING HAVING A MILK-BASED FILLING; FLOUR; SAUCES; CHUTNEY; RICE; BAKERY GOODS; BISCUITS; COOKIES; SPICES; BREAD; FROZEN AND PREPARED MEALS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF PASTA AND RICE | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | FRUIT DRINKS, FLAVORED WATER | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PB BRANDS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by M & N GROCERS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PB BRANDS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by M & N GROCERS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named SWAD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2026 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 26, 2026 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Dec 16, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 28, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 19, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 2, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 2, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 28, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 24, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 21, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 6, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 5, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 1, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 16, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 26, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 26, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 26, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |