USPTO serial 76617471
SPI-VEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPI-VEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BERKSHIRE, GB
EMERGENT PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT UK LIMITED
BERKSHIRE, GB
Other trademarks owned by EMERGENT PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT UK LIMITED
EMERGENT PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT UK LIMITED
BERKSHIRE, GB
Other trademarks owned by EMERGENT PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT UK LIMITED
Berkshire RG41 5TU, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Erin M. Clarke
ERIN M CLARKE OWEN, WICKERSHAM & ERICKSON PC455 MARKET ST FL 19SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2420UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical, veterinary, prophylactic, and therapeutic preparations all for use in the treatment of bacterial, viral, and fungal infections; cancer; allergies; and other immune modulated diseases | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Licensing of oral targeted delivery technology | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Medical and scientific research services; research, development, and testing of vaccines, pharmaceuticals, therapeutic preparations, and prophylactic preparations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EMERGENT EUROPE LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by EMERGENT PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT UK LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by EMERGENT PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT UK LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Microscience Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SPI-VEC
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 5, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 21, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 19, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 12, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 5, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |