Drawing for IGNITING BUSINESS

USPTO serial 76617706

IGNITING BUSINESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3468426Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 15, 2008
Examiner
BUSH, KAREN K
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IGNITING BUSINESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David N Schachter

LEIGH AUGUSTINE SHERMAN & HOWARD LLC633 SEVENTEENTH STREETSUITE 3000DENVER, CO 80202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consulting servicesSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDFeb 6, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 2, 2010C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Aug 2, 2010CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 14, 2010CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Mar 17, 2009PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 15, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 10, 2008REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 9, 2008CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
May 27, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 27, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 27, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 28, 2007CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 16, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 20, 2007PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2007PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
May 31, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Mar 5, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 3, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2006CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 18, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 18, 2006EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Dec 27, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 4, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 21, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 15, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 3, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 2, 2005CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 2, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 31, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 5, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance