Drawing for MY ACCERIS ONE

USPTO serial 76618683

MY ACCERIS ONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAYES, LAURIE ANN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MY ACCERIS ONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jon A. Schiffrin

JON A SCHIFFRIN JON A SCHIFFRIN PC10617 JONES ST STE 301AFAIRFAX, VA 22030-7505UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Telecommunications conferencing equipment and parts, namely, video and audio conferencing bridges used to establish visual, audio and data links between parties at different locations, conferencing switches, audio and video keysets and handsets; computer hardware and software for managing, administering, routing and transmitting computer electronic voice messaging, software for managing, administering, routing and transmitting conference calling, and web-interface software to manage account settings and voice and email messagingACTIVE—
038Telecommunications services, namely, integrated mail services consisting of voice mail, fax mail and e-mail that allow the user or subscriber to use one number for receiving telephone calls, voice mail, electronic mail, and faxes, automated attendant services, telephone, video and Internet conferencing services; providing access to telecommunication networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 21, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 21, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 27, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 13, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 10, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 9, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 8, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2005CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 8, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 9, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance