Drawing for GXL

USPTO serial 76619137

GXL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RAPPAPORT, SETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GXL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert B.G. Horowitz

Robert B. G. Horowitz Baker & Hostetler LLP45 Rockefeller PlazaNew York, NY 10111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Audiovisual projectors, video projectors, computer projectors, projection screens, and projection televisionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 2, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 2, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 4, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 4, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 30, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 27, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 27, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 10, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 13, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 13, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 10, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 31, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 13, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 13, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 23, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 30, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 30, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 4, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 21, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 21, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 3, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 11, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 21, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 27, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 24, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 22, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 15, 2005CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 15, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 6, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance