USPTO serial 76619409
FREDDY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3325228Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 30, 2007
- Examiner
- BRACEY, KAREN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FREDDY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rainbow Valley Fire Department, L.L.C.
Leawood, KS
Other trademarks owned by Rainbow Valley Fire Department, L.L.C.
Rainbow Valley Fire Department, L.L.C.
Leawood, KS
Other trademarks owned by Rainbow Valley Fire Department, L.L.C.
Rainbow Valley Fire Department, L.L.C.
Leawood, KS
Other trademarks owned by Rainbow Valley Fire Department, L.L.C.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kent R. Erickson
Kent R. Erickson Erickson, Kernell, Derusseau & Kleypas, LLC800 W 47th St, Suite 401Kansas City, MO 64112UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | GAMES AND PLAYTHINGS, NAMELY, DOLLS, DOLL ACCESSORIES, PLUSH TOYS AND SOFT SCULPTURE DOLLS, SOFT SCULPTURE PLUSH TOYS | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rainbow Valley Fire Department, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Rainbow Valley Fire Department, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Rainbow Valley Fire Department, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named FREDDY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2009 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 14, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 26, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 16, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 16, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 16, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 17, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |