Drawing for SUN COAST FARMS

USPTO serial 76619436

SUN COAST FARMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HERMAN, RUSS
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUN COAST FARMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary A. Harris

Mary A. Harris Mary A. Harris, Attorney at Law960 Toro StreetSAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401-3120UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Fresh fruits and vegetablesACTIVE—
035Importing and exporting of fresh fruit, fresh vegetables, ready-to-use garden salads, ready-to-use vegetable salads, and garden salads for others; marketing and cooperative advertising services for others in the area of fresh fruit and vegetables; online wholesale and retail store services featuring fresh fruit, fresh vegetables, fresh cut vegetables, fresh cut fruit and ready-to-use vegetable and garden saladsACTIVE—
039Packing and shipping of fresh fruit, fresh vegetables, fresh cut fruits, ready-to- use garden salads, and ready-to-use vegetable salads for othersACTIVE—
040Food processing services, namely, processing of fresh vegetables for use in ready-to-use garden and vegetable salads for others and processing of fresh fruit for use in ready-to-use fruit salads for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 18, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 18, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 7, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 7, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 6, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 6, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 11, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 11, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 11, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 16, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 16, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 16, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 29, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 29, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 29, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 17, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 25, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 5, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 5, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 2, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 23, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 2, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 23, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 21, 2005GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 21, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 15, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 9, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 18, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance