Drawing for SONRISE HOMES, INC.

USPTO serial 76619651

SONRISE HOMES, INC.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GEARIN, AMY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SONRISE HOMES, INC.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ernest I. Gifford

ERNEST I GIFFORD GIFFORD, KRASS, GROH, SPRINKLE, ANDERSONPO BOX 7021TROY, MI 48007-7021UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Home building, building and development of residential communitiesACTIVEJul 19, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 1, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 29, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 29, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 12, 2007EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 17, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Apr 17, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Feb 20, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 6, 2006RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Nov 6, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 11, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 13, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 11, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 11, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 10, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 4, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 29, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 15, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 19, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance