USPTO serial 76619726
1 2 3 MULTIMEDIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 1 2 3 MULTIMEDIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
31106 Toulouse cedex, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leon Medzhibovsky
LEON MEDZHIBOVSKY FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP666 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, providing for the electronic transmission, retrieval and display of data, messages, speech, signals, documents, games, text, screen savers, designs, logos, images, pictures, information, messages, speech, and signals onto computers and wireless devices; providing ring tone services for mobile telephones whereby users can select from a variety of call notification sounds; telecommunications services, namely, electronic transmission, retrieval and display of data and messages via a global computer network, via telefax, electronic mail, videotext and cell phone; electronic transmission of SMS (short messaging service) text messaging and MMS (multi media service) via mobile telephone systems; integrating audio and video communications for message exchange between telephones, the Internet and wireless devices; electronic mail and mailbox services; providing access to databases and global computer networks; electronic voice messaging, namely, the recording, storage, and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephone; communication by computers, namely, communication through computer networks and wireless networks; electronic data exchange; services of a database provider, namely, providing online access to data recorded in a database of the database provider; providing online access to data recorded in a database of the database provider; consulting services relating to all the foregoing services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 22, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 25, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 20, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 20, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |