USPTO serial 76619933
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Sale, Cheshire, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence D. Bradley
LAWRENCE D BRADLEY HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP10 ST JAMES AVEBOSTON, MA 02116UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer software design and development for others relating to supply chain execution and management | ACTIVE | Sep 14, 2004 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 24, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |