USPTO serial 76620033
WE THINK ULTRAFAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3216732Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 13, 2007
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WE THINK ULTRAFAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
A-6845 Hohenems, AT
A-6845 Hohenems, AT
A-6845 Hohenems, AT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James A. Oliff
James A. Oliff Oliff & Berridge, PLCP.O. Box 320850Alexandria, VA 22320-4850UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Laser welding machines; laser cutting machines; laser drilling machines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Lasers not for medical use; laser beam sources and laser systems comprising a laser beam source, not for medical use; C02 gas lasers not for medical use; solid state lasers not for medical use; diode lasers not for medical use; laser beam sources and laser system for machining materials with a laser beam, not for medical use; laser beam sources and laser systems for surface treatment with a laser beam, not for medical use; laser beam sources and laser systems for surface hardening with a laser beam, not for medical use; laser beam perforating units not for medical use; laser writing and marking systems not for medical use; component parts for laser beam sources and laser systems not for medical use | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | Lasers for medical use | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Technical consultation and scientific research in the field of laser technique; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of equipment and operation problems in the field of laser based system solutions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 18, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by High Q Laser Production GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by High Q Laser Production GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by High Q Laser Production GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named WE THINK ULTRAFAST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 3, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 26, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2005 | FFDM | FILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2005 | FFDM | FILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2004 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |