USPTO serial 76620141
CENTRAL VALLEY MULTIPLE LISTING SERVICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3080941Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 11, 2006
- Examiner
- MAHONEY, PAULA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CENTRAL VALLEY MULTIPLE LISTING SERVICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN P. O'BANION
JOHN P. O'BANION O'BANION & RITCHEY LLP400 CAPITOL MALL STE 1550SACRAMENTO, CA 95814-4498UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | REAL ESTATE LISTING SERVICES; PROVIDING INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF REAL ESTATE BY MEANS OF THE INTERNET | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 13, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Central Valley Association of Realtors, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Central Valley Association of Realtors, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named CENTRAL VALLEY MULTIPLE LISTING SERVICE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 11, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 20, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 27, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |