Drawing for LEWIS & CLARK OUTDOORS THE EXPEDITION CONTINUES

USPTO serial 76620196

LEWIS & CLARK OUTDOORS THE EXPEDITION CONTINUES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MILTON, PRISCILLA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEWIS & CLARK OUTDOORS THE EXPEDITION CONTINUES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gary Peterson

GARY PETERSON TWO LEADERSHIP SQ211 N ROBINSON AVE STE 450OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025FootwearACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 3, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 1, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 1, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 2, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 31, 2007PGTTPETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED—
Jan 18, 2007PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Jan 18, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 28, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 20, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 28, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 17, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 16, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 20, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 27, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 27, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 18, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 22, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 10, 1977PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance