USPTO serial 76620345
SILVERLEAF PLANTATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3952950Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 3, 2011
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SILVERLEAF PLANTATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
St. Augustine, FL
Jacksonville, FL
Jacksonville, FL
Jacksonville, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard S. Vermut
Richard S. Vermut Driver, McAfee, Peek & Hawthorne, P.L.One Independent Drive, Suite 1200Jacksonville, FL 32202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, THE OPERATION OF A PLANNED COMMUNITY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2004 |
| 037 | LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, CONSTRUCTION OF A PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OF MIXED USE, GATED AND UNGATED RESIDENTIAL, OFFICE, RETAIL, AND INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WHITE'S FORD TIMBER, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SJP, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SJP, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SJP, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named SILVERLEAF PLANTATION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 3, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 19, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 19, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 19, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Mar 19, 2011 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 19, 2011 | CU.G | CONCURRENT USE GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 20, 2008 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | ISCO | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - COMM.OFFICE REQUEST | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 26, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 8, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 13, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 15, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 5, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 25, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 18, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |