USPTO serial 76620806
NANOGUIDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3346560Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 4, 2007
- Examiner
- REGAN, JOHN B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NANOGUIDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Nanogate Advanced Materials GmbH
66121 Saarbruecken, DE
Nanogate Advanced Materials GmbH
66121 Saarbruecken, DE
Nanogate Advanced Materials GmbH
Quierschied-Gottelborn, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vincent L. Ramik
Vincent L. Ramik Miles & Stockbridge P.C.Suite 5001751 Pinnacle DriveMcLean, VA 22102-3833Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | LIGHT CONDUCTING ELEMENTS, NAMELY, FIBEROPTIC, LCD AND LED BACKLIGHTS, PARTICULARLY FOR DISPLAY SCREENS, MOBILE PHONES, PDAs, HANDHELD COMPUTERS; WAVEGUIDES, NAMELY, FIBEROPTIC, LCD AND LED BACKLIGHTS, PARTICULARLY FOR DISPLAY SCREENS, MOBILE PHONES, PDAs, HANDHELD COMPUTERS; OPTICAL FIBERS; BACKLIGHTS FOR LIGHT CONDUCTION, PARTICULARLY FOR DISPLAY SCREENS, MOBILE PHONES, PDAs, HANDHELD COMPUTERS; BACKLIGHTS WITH HOLOGRAMS, PARTICULARLY FOR DISPLAY SCREENS, MOBILE PHONES, PDAs, HANDHELD COMPUTERS; ELECTRICAL LIGHT SOURCES; DISPLAY DEVICES, NAMELY, LIGHT-EMITTING DIODE DISPLAYS; ELECTRIC LUMINESCENT ADVERTISEMENT PANELS; VISUAL DISPLAY UNITS, NAMELY, FLAT-PANEL DISPLAY SCREENS; MICROSCOPES; BINOCULARS; OPTICAL LENSES; PRISMS; DATA PROCESSORS AND COMPUTERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | PLASTIC EMBOSSING FOILS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nanogate Advanced Materials GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Nanogate Advanced Materials GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Nanogate Advanced Materials GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named NANOGUIDE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 18, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 29, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |