Drawing for CHOWDERFEST

USPTO serial 76620937

CHOWDERFEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AYALA, LOURDES
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHOWDERFEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott J. Fields

SCOTT J FIELDS NATIONAL IP RIGHTS CTR LLC550 TOWNSHIP LINE RD STE 400BLUE BELL, PA 19422-2726UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Organizing and hosting an annual group of community events featuring food and culinary exhibits, art exhibitions, flea markets and the likeACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 27, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 27, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 27, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 9, 2007EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 22, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 22, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 23, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 22, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 4, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 31, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 31, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 27, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 27, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance