USPTO serial 76621000
TUNED BY MATRIX GR MOTORSPORTS INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOLTZ, ALLISON
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TUNED BY MATRIX GR MOTORSPORTS INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALLEN A. MEYER, JR. [MARYLAND STATE BAR]
CAROL DESMOND TRADEMARKS TO GO, INC.445 HAMILTON AVENUESUITE #1102WHITE PLAINS, NY 10601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | automotive parts, products, tools and accessories for the automotive after market industry, namely grill guards; plastic parts for vehicles, namely, automotive exterior and interior plastic extruded decorative and protective trim; license plate frames; rearview mirrors; mud guards; engine accessory and dress-up kits comprising clutch housing and clamps and brake reservoir and clamps; interior dress-up kits consisting of tilt lever, turn signal lever, emergency flasher knob and shifter knob; engine hose dress-up kits, comprising braided hose coverings, hose connectors, and cap covers; valves for vehicle tires; oil dipsticks; steering wheel covers; automobile windshield sunshades; trailer hitches; horns; heel covers, namely, heel rests and heel guards; beverage holders and trays; door pockets; battery trays and hold-downs; air pumps; anti-theft devices, namely, steering wheel locks; fitted and semi-fitted car covers; seat cushions; brush guards; interior door lock knobs; shifter knobs; gas pedals and brake pedals; lug nuts for vehicle wheels; anti-theft locks for vehicle lug nuts; exterior mirrors; stone guards; windshield wipers; wheel caps; chains,;shock-absorbing springs | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | retail store services, wholesale store services, and distributorships in the field of automotive parts, products, tools and accessories | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by G.R. Sales
- Other trademarks owned by G.R. Sales
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named TUNED BY MATRIX GR MOTORSPORTS INC.
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 11, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 2, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 10, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 6, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |