Drawing for TAMTRON

USPTO serial 76621018

TAMTRON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TAMTRON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROY S GORDET

98 BATTERY ST STE 601SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic and digital scales; electronic and digital overload indicators, computer controlled electronic and digital scales, wireless control electronic and digital scales; personal computer controlled scales and related data processing computer hardware, wireless computer hardware for communications; on board computer and wireless computer hardware for communications for loading and transporting equipment and vehicles; computer programs and software for network satellites-based positioning, locating, tracking, mapping and navigation; computer hardware and computer software for access control, time attendance and data collection, bar code and RFID identification computer hardware and software; parts and accessories to all aforementioned goodsACTIVE—
035Tracking and monitoring of freight and packages utilizing satellites-based positioningACTIVE—
042Mapping services for others utilizing satellites-based positioningACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 7, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 9, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 9, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 9, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 11, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 18, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 29, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 3, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 24, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 22, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 22, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 22, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 21, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 27, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jan 12, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 5, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 19, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 15, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 23, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 16, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance