USPTO serial 76621045
BABY TATA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLAIR, JASON
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BABY TATA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Jersey City, NJ
Jersey City, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maria v. Hardison
MARIA V HARDISON TASSAN & HARDISON4143 27TH ST NARLINGTON, VA 22207-5211UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | KITS COMPRISED OF MASSAGE OILS AND PRE-RECORDED DVD'S FEATURING BABY MASSAGE, BABY PLAY, AND BABY EXERCISE | ABANDONED | Oct 22, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 22, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |