USPTO serial 76621071
WEALTH SIMPLIFICATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3048087Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 24, 2006
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WEALTH SIMPLIFICATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Diamond Bar, CA, US
Diamond Bar, CA, US
Diamond Bar, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas F. Bergert
Thomas F. Bergert Williams Mullen321 East Main Street, Suite 400Charlottesville, VA 22902-3200UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Providing consultation and advice in the fields of financial portfolio and legacy planning | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 28, 2004 |
| 041 | Personal coaching services in the field of lifestyle; educational services, namely, providing workshops for personal and financial goal setting and achievement | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 28, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Trustee of the Birgen Family Trust dated 11/05/1990, the trustee comprising Robert M. Birgen, a US Citizen
- Other trademarks owned by The Trustee of the Birgen Family Trust dated 11/05/1990, the trustee comprising Robert M. Birgen, a US Citizen
- Other trademarks owned by The Trustee of the Birgen Family Trust dated 11/05/1990, the trustee comprising Robert M. Birgen, a US Citizen
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named WEALTH SIMPLIFICATION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2026 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 24, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 19, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 9, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2011 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Jul 1, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 19, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 1, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 1, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 29, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 28, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |