Drawing for LATERALLOCK

USPTO serial 76621072

LATERALLOCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWELL, LINDA
Law office
OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LATERALLOCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

L. Grant Foster

L GRANT FOSTER HOLLAND & HART LLPPO BOX 11583SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84147-0583UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019INTERLOCKING FLOOR TILES MADE OF PLASTICABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 2006ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Sep 1, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 16, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 26, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 21, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 17, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 16, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 16, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 16, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 15, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 3, 2006MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 1, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2006REINREINSTATED—
Feb 15, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 1, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 21, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 24, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 2, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance