Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 76621321?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/76621321. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns WHEY BETTER THAN SOY?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 76621321, the listed owner(s) include: HARDEN FOODS, INC..

What is USPTO serial number 76621321?

Serial number 76621321 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark WHEY BETTER THAN SOY. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of WHEY BETTER THAN SOY?

WHEY BETTER THAN SOY (76621321) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover WHEY BETTER THAN SOY?

The public record lists International Classes: 030. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

USPTO serial 76621321

WHEY BETTER THAN SOY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Nov 18, 2004
Status date: Aug 13, 2007
Registration date: —
Examiner: DUBOIS, MICHELLE
Law office: TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHEY BETTER THAN SOY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

HARDEN FOODS, INC.
Philadelphia, PA
Other trademarks owned by HARDEN FOODS, INC.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK A. GARZIA

MARK A GARZIA LAW OFFICES OF MARK GARZIA2058 CHICHESTER AVEBOOTHWYN, PA 19061-3735UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
030	Food products namely, snacks in the nature of puffed corn snacks, cheese curls and ready-to-eat salty snacks, namely, tortilla chips, taco chips, and corn chips	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Aug 28, 2007	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Aug 13, 2007	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Aug 13, 2007	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Jun 26, 2007	EXFB	EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF	—
Apr 12, 2007	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Apr 12, 2007	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Oct 12, 2006	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 11, 2006	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 29, 2006	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Aug 18, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Aug 18, 2006	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Feb 15, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2006	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Jan 3, 2006	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Dec 27, 2005	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jun 27, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2005	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Dec 3, 2004	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—