USPTO serial 76621466
THE NORDIA QUALITY ADVANTAGE: YOUR CORPORATE ADVANTAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE NORDIA QUALITY ADVANTAGE: YOUR CORPORATE ADVANTAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec H3A 3L6, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald L. Dennison
DONALD L DENNISON DENNISON, SCHULTZ, DOUGHERTY & MACDONALD1727 KING ST STE 105ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-2700UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Information services provided by electronic means or by telephone operators, namely, customer care services, calling centers services, emergency calling services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |