USPTO serial 76621539
CHOCO CRO CAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHOCO CRO CAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gabrielle S. Roth
GABRIELLE S ROTH DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO MORIN & OSHINSKY LLP2101 L ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-1526UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Dairy products, namely, cream, milk, yogurt, butter, honey butter and milk products, namely, cheese, whipped cream, milk curd, sour cream, kefir, cream cheese, whey, whole milk, and milk beverages, namely, milk-based beverages containing coffee, chocolate milk, and flavored milk; fruit salads; fruit pulp; vegetable salads; jams; and soups | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Chocolate-based beverages in the nature of chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable based; cocoa-based beverages in the nature of prepared cocoa and cocoa-based beverages; beverages made of coffee; beverages made of tea; bread; bread rolls; buns; bread filled with chocolate; bread filled with bean jam; toast; cakes; cocoa; chocolates; cocoa products, namely cocoa paste for drinks, cocoa powder for drinks, cocoa mixes; cocoa spreads; coffee; coffee beans; coffee flavorings; ice cream; honey; dressings for salad; edible ices, namely, ice candies, fruit ice and shaved ice; confectionery ices, namely frozen yogurt; confectionery fruit jellies; pies; pizzas; sandwiches; sugar; sherbets; natural sweeteners; tea; prepared hamburger sandwiches; prepared hot dog sandwiches; confectionery, namely, candy for food, caramels,non-medicated chewing gum, confectionery for decorating Christmas trees, namely, candy canes, cookies, wafers, sponge cakes, cream puffs, doughnuts, hotcakes, marshmallows, popcorn, crackers, custard, non-medicated lozenges, marzipan, pancakes, pastilles, puddings, rusks, tarts, waffles, biscuits, and bread containing cooked foods | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Beer; non-alcoholic beverages, namely, aerated water, aperitifs, whey beverages, sweet cider, fruit nectars, ginger ale, ginger beer, isotonic beverages, lemonades, sherbet beverages, tomato juice, fruit juices, non-alcoholic beverages containing fruit juices, mineral water, soda water, soft drinks, Chinese lemon beverages in the nature of non-alcoholic fruit beverages, and vegetable juices; and syrups for beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | COFFEE SHOP SERVICES; CAFE RESTAURANT SERVICES; CAFE SERVICES; CAFETERIA SERVICES; CANTEEN SERVICES; SNACK-BAR SERVICES; RESTAURANT SERVICES; SELF-SERVICE RESTAURANT SERVICES; BAKERY RESTAURANT SERVICES; AND CATERING SERVICES FOR FOOD AND BEVERAGES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SAINT MARC CAFE CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by SAINT MARC CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by SAINT MARC CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named CHOCO CRO CAFE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 5, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 5, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 3, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 11, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 21, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 2, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2005 | CPEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |