USPTO serial 76621571
JOHNSON PARKER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JOHNSON PARKER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAY A. BONDELL
JAY A. BONDELL SCHWEITZER CORNMAN GROSS & BONDELLP.O. BOX 237151NEW YORK, NY 10023-0031UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | BUBBLE BATH CONCENTRATES; HAND AND BODY SOAPS; HAND AND BODY CREAMS; HAND AND BODY WASHES; HAIR SHAMPOOS; HAIR GELS AND HAIR CONDITIONERS; PERSONAL DEODORANTS; NON-MEDICATED BABY POWDERS, BABY LOTIONS, BUBBLE BATH ADDITIVES, BABY OILS AND BABY SHAMPOOS; FOOT POWDERS; AND COSMETIC PETROLEUM JELLY | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 20, 2010 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 7, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |