USPTO serial 76621621
MULTIMEDIANAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- IM, JEAN H
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MULTIMEDIANAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
M-SYSTEMS FLASK DISK PIONEERS LTD.
Kfar Saba 44425, IL
Other trademarks owned by M-SYSTEMS FLASK DISK PIONEERS LTD.
KFAR SABA, IL
KFAR SABA, IL
KFAR SABA, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dana Brody-Brown
Dana Brody-Brown White & Case LLP3000 El Camino Real5 Palo Alto Square, 9th FloorPalo Alto, CA 94306Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware, including data storage and security devices; computer memory hardware; computer hardware which enables diverse functionalities of computer hardware for data storage; silicon chip which acts as a computer disk for information storage; semiconductor chips that function as memory module for computers, wireless phones, personal digital assistants, and other industrial equipment; computer software for the collection, editing, organizing, modifying, book marking, transmission, storage and sharing of data and information; USB hardware; USB operating software; computer software for accessing, interfacing and customizing computer hardware for data storage, for easy to use data storage functionality and for controlling and executing other software applications; multi-chip flash disk that provides data and code storage; flash memory disk device providing secure data storage; blank electronic chip cards and encoded electronic chip cards containing programming used to store electronic content including music, video, games and books; flash memory cards; integrated circuit chips for data storage; blank and pre-recorded non-volatile flash disks that provide data storage; and user manuals packaged together therewith as a unit | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consultation and customization relating to the following goods-- Computer hardware; computer memory hardware; Computer hardware which enables diverse functionalities of computer hardware for data storage; Silicon chip which acts as a computer disk for information storage; semiconductor chips that function as memory module for computers, wireless phones, PDAs, and other industrial equipment; computer software for the collection, editing, organizing, modifying, book marking, transmission, storage and sharing of data and information; USB hardware; USB operating software; data storage and security devices; Computer software for accessing, interfacing and customizing computer hardware for data storage, for easy to use data storage functionality and for controlling and executing other software applications; multichip package data storage devices; flash memory disk device providing secure data storage; electronic chip cards; flash memory cards; integrated circuit chips for data storage; non-volatile flash disks that provide data storage | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by M-SYSTEMS FLASK DISK PIONEERS LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by MSYSTEMS LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by MSYSTEMS LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by SANDISK IL LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MULTIMEDIANAND
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 22, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 22, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 5, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 5, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 22, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 10, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 15, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 14, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2006 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |