USPTO serial 76621622
MULTIMEDIAFLASH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3403731Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 25, 2008
- Examiner
- ALTREE, NICHOLAS
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MULTIMEDIAFLASH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
M-SYSTEMS FLASH DISK PIONEERS LTD.
Kfar Saba 44425, IL
Other trademarks owned by M-SYSTEMS FLASH DISK PIONEERS LTD.
KFAR SABA, IL
KFAR SABA, IL
KFAR SABA, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dana Brody-Brown
Dana Brody-Brown Lewis and Roca LLP2440 W. El Camino Real, 6th FloorMountain View, CA 94040-1499UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware, computer memory hardware; computer hardware which enables diverse functionalities of computer hardware for data storage; silicon chips which act as computer disks for information storage; semiconductor chips that function as memory modules for computers, wireless phones, personal digital assistants, and other industrial equipment; computer software for the collection, editing, organizing, modifying, book marking, transmission, storage and sharing of data and information; universal serial bus (USB) hardware; USB operating software; data storage and security devices, namely, USB flash drive, memory card, and high density subscriber identity module (SIM) cards that provide high performance and secure storage for computerized systems; computer software for use in accessing, interfacing and customizing computer hardware for data storage, for easy to use data storage functionality and for controlling and executing other software applications; multi-chip package data storage devices, namely, flash disks that store and manage data and code information for computerized systems; secure data storage devices, namely, flash memory disks for carrying and launching software applications and storing multimedia content; blank electronic chip cards; encoded electronic chip cards containing programming used to store electronic content including, music, video, games, and books; flash memory cards; integrated circuit chips for data storage; non-volatile flash disks that provide data storage; and user manuals packaged together therewith as a unit | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by M-SYSTEMS FLASH DISK PIONEERS LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by MSYSTEMS LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by SANDISK IL LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by SANDISK IL LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named MULTIMEDIAFLASH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2009 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 27, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2007 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 5, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 10, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2006 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 5, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 1, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 1, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 27, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 28, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |