Drawing for CORDIS CASES

USPTO serial 76621771

CORDIS CASES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RUTLAND, BARBARA A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CORDIS CASES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard F. Biribauer

RICHARD F BIRIBAUER JOHNSON & JOHNSONONE JOHNSON & JOHNSON PLZNEW BRUNSWICK, NJ 08933-7001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF NON-DOWNLOADABLE, ON-LINE PROGRAMS TO BE USED BY PHYSICIANS, NURSES AND OTHER HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS TO LEARN ABOUT CAROTID ANATOMY AND STENTING VIA THE INTERNETACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 5, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Sep 5, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 5, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 2, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 1, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 20, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance