USPTO serial 76621903
Y
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Y?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles E. Payne
CHARLES E. PAYNE ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR AT LAW218 61ST STREETVIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23451UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Men's, women's, and children's clothing, namely, shirts, shorts, sweatshirts, sweat pants, jackets, caps and socks | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Snorts equipment, namely, personal exercise mats and protective bras, wrist bands and head bands specifically adapted for use while engaged in sports activity as a means of keeping perspiration from the wearers' eyes and on their bands and bags specifically adapted for carrying exercise matts and exercise bIocks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 28, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 29, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 7, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | UNDR | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | UNDR | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | PRRD | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST DENIED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2007 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 25, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 25, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |