Drawing for SKY HIGH ENTERTAINMENT

USPTO serial 76621912

SKY HIGH ENTERTAINMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLAYTON, CHERYL A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SKY HIGH ENTERTAINMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel J. Bourque

DANIEL J BOURQUE BOURQUE & ASSOCIATES835 HANOVER ST STE 301MANCHESTER, NH 03104-5401UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Interactive video games of virtual reality comprised of computer hardware and software and Interactive video games comprised of computer hardware and softwareACTIVE—
016printed material namely posters, brochures about various film topics, magazines featuring information about various film topics and albumsACTIVE—
028board games, toys and non-electronic games namely board games, trivia games and knowledge based gamesACTIVE—
041Entertainment services namely, production and distribution of motion picture films, production of videodiscs and DVDs for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 26, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Apr 26, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 25, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 2, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 24, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 23, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 19, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 27, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 27, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 29, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 9, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance