CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for THE CHARMED LOOK

USPTO serial 76622387

THE CHARMED LOOK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE CHARMED LOOK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard L. Morris, Jr.

RICHARD L MORRIS JR ESQ RICHARD L MORRIS JR ESQC/O 1-800-4-TRADEMARKPO BOX 398538MIAMI BEACH, FL 33239

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Protective eyewear, safety eyewear, sports eyewear, Eyewear, namely, eyeglasses, sunglasses, frames, lenses and eyeglass cases; Eyewear accessories, namely, straps, neck cords, and headstraps.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 19, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 18, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 24, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 4, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 13, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 9, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 2, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 30, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 18, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 7, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 7, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 8, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2005CEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Jul 1, 2005CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jun 30, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 14, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance