Drawing for FREQUENCY FILTER

USPTO serial 76622582

FREQUENCY FILTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LAMOTHE, LESLEY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FREQUENCY FILTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Levy

MARK LEVY MARK LEVY & ASSOCIATES PLLCPRESS BLDG STE 90219 CHENANGO STBINGHAMTON, NY 13901

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, shirts, hats, caps, gloves, jackets, underwear, t-shirts, bras, underpants, socks,shoes, sneakers and sandalsACTIVEAug 23, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 9, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Feb 9, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Jan 23, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 12, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 12, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2006ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jan 27, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 12, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 15, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance