USPTO serial 76622591
Ô2
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3052700Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 31, 2006
- Examiner
- LEE, DOUGLAS
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Ô2?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert L. Sherman
ROBERT L SHERMAN PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP75 E 55TH ST FL C1NEW YORK, NY 10022-3404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumery products namely perfumes, eau de cologne, perfumed water, skin lotions, soaps, bath and shower foaming compositions and gels; cosmetics namely creams, gels, milks, powders and lotions for the face, body and hands; make-up products namely mascara, eye liner, eye shadow, eyebrow pencil, lipsticks, nail polish, blush, foundation creams and powder, body deodorants; sun care preparations namely tanning and after-sun milks, gels and oils; essential oils for personal use | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lancome Parfums et Beaute & Cie
- Other trademarks owned by Lancome Parfums et Beaute & Cie
- Other trademarks owned by Lancome Parfums et Beaute & Cie
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named Ô2
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2007 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2007 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 31, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 8, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |