USPTO serial 76622658
OPERATICS NEW YORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3342403Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 27, 2007
- Examiner
- HAN, DAWN L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with OPERATICS NEW YORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, JP
Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, JP
Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James A. Oliff
James A. Oliff Oliff & Berridge, PLCP.O. Box 320850Alexandria, VA 22320-4850UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Precious metals designed in New York; key rings of precious metal designed in New York; personal ornaments of precious metal designed in New York; jewelry cases of precious metal designed in New York; purses and wallets of precious metal designed in New York; semi-wrought precious stones and their imitations designed in New York; powder compacts of precious metal designed in New York; shoe ornaments of precious metal designed in New York; clocks and watches designed in New York; smokers' articles of precious metal, namely, ashtrays, cigarette cases designed in New York | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 018 | Handbag frames designed in New York; purse frames designed in New York; industrial packaging containers of leather designed in New York; leather handbags designed in New York; handbags designed in New York; leather tote bags designed in New York; tote bags designed in New York; leather shoulder bags designed in New York; shoulder bags designed in New York; leather briefcases designed in New York; briefcases designed in New York; leather briefcase-type portfolios designed in New York; briefcase-type portfolios designed in New York; document cases designed in New York; leather knapsacks designed in New York; knapsacks designed in New York; leather travel bags designed in New York; travel bags designed in New York; leather suitcases designed in New York; suitcases designed in New York; toiletry cases sold empty designed in New York; leather toiletry cases sold empty designed in New York; leather trunks designed in New York; trunks designed in New York; wheeled upright carry-on bags designed in New York; leather clutch bags designed in New York; clutch bags designed in New York; leather party bags designed in New York; business card cases designed in New York; key cases designed in New York; wallets designed in New York; coin purses not of precious metal designed in New York; drawstring pouches designed in New York; umbrellas designed in New York; umbrella parts, namely umbrella frames designed in New York; unworked or semi-worked leather designed in New York; clothing for domestic pets designed in New York; vanity cases sold empty designed in New York | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | Cushions designed in New York; hand-held flat fans designed in New York; hand-held folding fans designed in New York; furniture designed in New York; picture frames designed in New York; non-metal key rings designed in New York | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Clothing designed in New York, namely T-shirts, aprons, mufflers, shawls, scarves, gloves, hats and caps, underwear; waistbands designed in New York; belts for clothing designed in New York; footwear designed in New York | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Marvelous Creation Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Marvelous Creation Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Marvelous Creation Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named OPERATICS NEW YORK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 4, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 3, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 20, 2007 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 3, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |