USPTO serial 76622772
PCP PROCARPARTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3713611Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 24, 2009
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PCP PROCARPARTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KAM LOUIE
FREDERICK GOTHA301 EAST COLORADO BOULEVARDSUITE 800PASADENA, CA 91101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Online retail store services and wholesale store services featuring automotive parts and accessories therefor | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2011 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 15, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 30, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 10, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |