USPTO serial 76622840
DUKE MARKETING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DUKE MARKETING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Rafael, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Linda Joy Kattwinkel
LINDA JOY KATTWINKEL OWEN WICKERSHAM & ERICKSON PC455 MARKET ST 19TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS MARKETING SERVICES AND CONSULTATION, DIRECT MAIL CONSULTING SERVICES, CONDUCTING MARKET STUDIES, PROVIDING BUSINESS MARKETING INFORMATION AND INTERACTIVE BUSINESS MARKETING CONSULTING SERVICES VIA THE INTERNET, AND DIRECT MARKETING ADVERTISING FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 15, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |