USPTO serial 76622987
BLESS OUR BRAVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DINALLO, KEVIN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BLESS OUR BRAVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES F. BAIRD
JAMES F BAIRDPO BOX 574WEST BROOKFIELD, MA 01585-0574UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | decorative magnets; decorative refrigerator magnets; electronic publications, namely, blogs, letters, emails featuring topics in the fields of safety, prevention, survival, emergencies, news, non-profit related, history, records, education, disasters, patriotism, political, and awareness, all recorded on computer media; highway flares; highway safety cones; magnets and decorative magnets; mouse pads; protective helmets for sports; refrigerator magnets; safety equipment namely, beacon lights; safety helmets; safety markers; safety products, namely, reflective safety bands to be worn on the body; sports helmets | ACTIVE | Jul 15, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WIRELESS MARKETING ENTERPRISES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by WIRELESS MARKETING ENTERPRISES, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named BLESS OUR BRAVE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 23, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | PGSU | PETITION GRANTED - SOU FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2008 | MAB7 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 20, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 31, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2006 | RGRR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 3, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2005 | FFDM | FILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |