USPTO serial 76623044
BARITOWN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BARITOWN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
FT. LAUDERDALE, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence Caplan
Lawrence Caplan Lawrence A. Caplan, P.A.Suite 400E1900 Corporate Blvd.Boca Raton, FL 33431Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Providing an interactive Internet-based community, namely, online chat rooms, for exchange of messages and ideas amongst computer users in the field of weight loss surgery and for weight loss surgery patients | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2008 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 9, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |