Drawing for QC QUALITY CHOICE HEALTHCARD

USPTO serial 76623069

QC QUALITY CHOICE HEALTHCARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAN, DAWN L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QC QUALITY CHOICE HEALTHCARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric S. Wachspress

ERIC S WACHSPRESS MYRON E SIEGEL & ASSOCIATES LTD1727 N NATOMA AVECHICAGO, IL 60707-3917UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Magnetically encoded discount benefit cards which entitle the holder to receive discounts on prescriptions, doctor visits, dental care and vision careACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 17, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 17, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 16, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 5, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Feb 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 6, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 17, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 26, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 26, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 8, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 8, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 21, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance