USPTO serial 76623091
SILVERLEAF PLANTATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3952951Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 3, 2011
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SILVERLEAF PLANTATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Jacksonville, FL
Jacksonville, FL
Jacksonville, FL
St. Augustine, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard S. Vermut
Richard S. Vermut Driver, McAfee, Peek & Hawthorne, P.L.One Independent Drive, Suite 1200Jacksonville, FL 32202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Real estate management services, namely, the operation of a planned community | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2004 |
| 037 | Land development services, namely, construction of a planned community development of mixed use, grated and ungated residential, office, retail, and industrial properties | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SJP, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SJP, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SJP, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by WHITE'S FORD TIMBER, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named SILVERLEAF PLANTATION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 3, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 19, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 19, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 19, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Mar 19, 2011 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 19, 2011 | CU.G | CONCURRENT USE GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 20, 2008 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 31, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 31, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 31, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 25, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |