USPTO serial 76623113
SMARTSHOPPER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SISUN, SCOTT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMARTSHOPPER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
P.C. 6021, Larnaca, CY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christine M. Baker
CHRISTINE M BAKER MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKYCHRYSLER CTR666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-4011Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software for use in providing shopping guide information services via a global computer network; computer software for comparative shopping, namely, a desk top tool that enables consumers to compare retail offers, view product reviews, store ratings and auction listings, and find shopping and travel deals | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Shopping guide information services in the nature of providing information as to where goods or services can be purchased and providing links to other websites where goods or services can be purchased, all via a global computer network; promoting the goods and services of others through search engine referral traffic, namely, hypertext providing links to the web sites of others; price comparison services; providing information on retail bargains via a global computer network | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 039 | Online travel information services, namely, providing information on travel bargains via a global computer network | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | Nov 11, 2004 |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing a search engine for obtaining price information on consumer products and services via a global computer network | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 31, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 2, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |