Drawing for V3 IMPACT

USPTO serial 76623336

V3 IMPACT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, BRIDGETT G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with V3 IMPACT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Pat Heptig

J. Pat Heptig Heptig Law Group, Ltd.5400 LBJ Frwy., Suite 1200Dallas, TX 75240UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed materials, namely, workbooks, wall charts and skill guides for use in workshops, lectures, course symposia and conferences in the field of business management, sales communication and building relationships with customersACTIVE—
041Education services, namely, conducting workshops, lectures, course symposia and conferences in the field of business management, sales communication and building relationships with customers and distributing course materials in connection therewithACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 10, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 18, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 18, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 18, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 18, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 18, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 3, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 3, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 3, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 9, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 9, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 16, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 5, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Aug 5, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 5, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 5, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 10, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 29, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 28, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 18, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 15, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 12, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 11, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 29, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance