Drawing for THE RADAR AND LASER EXPERTS

USPTO serial 76623368

THE RADAR AND LASER EXPERTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3178684Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 28, 2006
Examiner
GAST, PAUL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with THE RADAR AND LASER EXPERTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elisabeth A. Evert

Elisabeth A. Evert Hitchcock Evert LLPP O Box 131709Dallas, TX 75313-1709UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Police radar and laser detectors combined with an audible and/or visible warning annunciatorSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 30, 2017CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jan 20, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 20, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2015REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 8, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 1, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 23, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 5, 2013NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 20138.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Sep 24, 2012EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2012PRA8POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8—
Apr 10, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 6, 20128.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
Mar 6, 2012ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 19, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 1, 2008CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Aug 22, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2006R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Oct 25, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 20, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 12, 2006CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Oct 12, 2006IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Oct 11, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2006AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 27, 2006EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2006ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 26, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 23, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance