Drawing for DELIKATOS

USPTO serial 76623445

DELIKATOS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DELIKATOS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ERIK W. IBELE

ERIK W IBELE NEIDER & BOUCHER SC440 SCIENCE DR STE 300MADISON, WI 53711UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029CHEESEACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 5, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 22, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 5, 2007EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 16, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 10, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 10, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 10, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 10, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 5, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 21, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 23, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance