USPTO serial 76623532
MAYA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4194811Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 21, 2012
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MAYA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joanne E. Gillespie
Joanne E. Gillespie91 Lichfield RoadMarkham, Ontario, L3R 0W9CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Electrical vehicles, namely, electric automobiles, hybrid combination gas and electric cars | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 17, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 6, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 11, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 2, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 31, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 10, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 5, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |