USPTO serial 76623748
MINK BIKINI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MINK BIKINI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy J. Lockhart
TIMOTHY J LOCKHART WILLCOX & SAVAGE PC1800 BANK OF AMERICA CTRONE COMMERCIAL PLNORFOLK, VA 23510Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Articles of outerwear for women, namely, dresses, trousers, skirts, jumpsuits, pantsuits, blouses, vests, cardigans, sweaters, waistcoats, coats, jackets, raincoats, scarves, belts, headbands, caps, hats, socks, hosiery, and footwear, excluding bikini swimwear, bikini underwear, and all other types of bikini clothing and all clothing made of mink | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 19, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 19, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 25, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 30, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2006 | ZZBX | ALLOWANCE WITHDRAWN-INADVERTENTLY ISSUED ACTION | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 12, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 22, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 4, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |