USPTO serial 76623877
AIRPLAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3178926Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 5, 2006
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AIRPLAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James E. Rosini, Esq.
James E. Rosini, Esq. Kenyon & Kenyon LLPOne BroadwayNew York, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software program that integrates and controls the core capabilities of aircraft in-flight computer hardware provided by third-parties with end-user computer applications also authored by third parties, the display of which will be accomplished by a [geographical] * graphical * user interface | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 20, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Jan 2, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 18, 2017 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2017 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 5, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 19, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 22, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 28, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |