Drawing for THE CRAFTSMAN RUG COLLECTION

USPTO serial 76624001

THE CRAFTSMAN RUG COLLECTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE CRAFTSMAN RUG COLLECTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen M. Litwin

STEPHEN M LITWIN LAW OFFICES OF STEPHEN M LITWIN1 SHIP STPROVIDENCE, RI 02903-4216UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
027RugsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 28, 2008PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Feb 4, 2008PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jan 22, 2008PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 5, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 12, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 23, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 19, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 14, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 3, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 1, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 30, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 18, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance