CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for BLING

USPTO serial 76624072

BLING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4208126Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 18, 2012
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kent M. Walker

HIP HOP STOCK EXCHANGE & INVESTMENT INC3240 OLIVE ST #44LEMON GROVE, CA 91945UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003oral goods, namely, toothpasteSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDNov 1, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2013C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Sep 26, 2013CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 25, 2013CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Jun 11, 2013PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 18, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 3, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 3, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 13, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 30, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 21, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 18, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 18, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 18, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 18, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 17, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 17, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 30, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 12, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 9, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 8, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 8, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 7, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 7, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 26, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 27, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 27, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 24, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 12, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 29, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 15, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 20, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 30, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance