USPTO serial 76624189
ENDURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HWANG, JOHN C B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENDURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
St. Laurent, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANGELO NOTARO
Angelo Notaro Notaro & Michalos P.C.100 Dutch Hill RoadSuite 110Orangeburg, NY 10962Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | HOCKEY STICKS AND REPLACEMENT STICK BLADES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 1, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 8, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 21, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 9, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 4, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |